Why Do All Ethereum Addresses Start with «1»?

The age-old question that has puzzled developers, users, and even some enthusiasts. As we delve into the intricacies of Ethereum’s address system, it becomes clear why addresses like «1» start with this particular number. In this article, we’ll explore the history, mechanics, and implications behind these unique addresses.

A Brief History

The first block on the Ethereum blockchain was mined on January 3, 2015. The creator of Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin, chose to use the «1» as the starting point for his address system in an attempt to simplify and standardize the way users would interact with the network.

In those early days, each address was generated using a unique number from 0 to 2^256 – 1. However, this led to a problem: the first block of the Ethereum blockchain only had a limited capacity for transactions, and the resulting addresses exceeded the available pool. To solve this issue, Vitalik Buterin decided to adopt an alternative approach.

The «1» as the Starting Point

By starting with «1», the address system was able to accommodate all possible hexadecimal values ​​(0-65535). This meant that the first block of transactions could have anywhere from 62,626 to 131,072 unique addresses. With each subsequent block, the number of available addresses increased exponentially.

This decision wasn’t taken lightly; in fact, it required significant changes to the Ethereum smart contract architecture and the underlying data structures used by the blockchain. However, these changes ultimately allowed for a more efficient and scalable network that could handle an increasing volume of transactions.

Why Can’t We Just Delete «1»?

One might wonder why deleting «1» from addresses wouldn’t be enough to resolve the issue. The answer lies in the underlying mathematics of Ethereum’s address system.

In essence, the number 1 doesn’t have any inherent meaning or value; it simply represents the first possible hexadecimal value. By using this convention, Vitalik Buterin ensured that all addresses could still function correctly and efficiently, even if we were to remove «1» from them.

To illustrate this point, consider a simple example:

If you had an address like «11111111», removing the «1» would result in the hexadecimal value «00000000». However, this does not affect the functionality of that address. In fact, it’s likely that most users wouldn’t even notice the change.

Conclusion

The use of «1» as the starting point for Ethereum addresses may seem arbitrary at first glance. However, its implementation was a deliberate design choice that helped ensure the network’s scalability and efficiency. By using this convention, Vitalik Buterin created a robust and adaptable address system that can handle an ever-growing number of transactions.

As we continue to explore the intricacies of Ethereum, it’s essential to appreciate the thought and effort that went into designing this innovative technology. Whether you’re a seasoned developer or simply interested in understanding the inner workings of blockchain networks, the «1» addresses remain a fascinating example of how clever design can shape the world around us.

Fork Nodes Trading